Behavior for invalid construction / occupancy class codes
This topic describes how Touchstone handles import of invalid construction / occupancy class codes.
Touchstone allows you to import all combinations of construction and occupancy codes, even if a particular combination does not produce loss during an analysis. However, if a location has a construction or occupancy code that is not a valid Touchstone-supported code, Touchstone does not import the location. If you try to import a location with valid Touchstone-supported construction and occupancy codes, but one or both of these codes is invalid for the country or region in which the location is located, Touchstone imports this location and notes the incompatibility in the import log.
- Ignore: The loss engine omits from the analysis all
locations that have construction and occupancy combinations that are invalid based
on region/country, model, and/or peril. In this case, Touchstone does not produce loss for these
locations. To identify locations that were not included in a loss analysis, check
the analysis log.Use System Default: During a detailed loss analysis, Touchstone remaps invalid construction and occupancy code combinations using either of the following construction and occupancy class codes, as applicable. In Touchstone 6.0 and later, Touchstone uses this option for each model individually within the analysis.Note:
Touchstone does not remap construction and occupancy codes for offshore locations; this is because all combinations of offshore asset construction and occupancy are valid. However, make sure that you do not accidentally assign an onshore construction or occupancy code to an offshore location. In some models the construction and occupancy class code combination 100-300 is not valid and Touchstone remaps it to 100-311. For exposures in South America, the construction and occupancy class code combination 100-300 is valid, and Touchstone does not remap it. During an analysis, upon identifying a location with an invalid combination, Touchstone remaps the affected construction and/or occupancy codes by performing one of the processes listed in the following table for each model involved in the analysis.
Construction Code Valid? |
Occupancy Code Valid? |
Remapping Process |
---|---|---|
Invalid for model |
Valid for model |
|
Valid for model |
Invalid for model |
|
Invalid for model |
Invalid for model |
|
Valid for model, but incompatible with occupancy code |
Valid for model, but incompatible with construction code |
|
When there are invalid pairs, you may see the same loss numbers in a portfolio/multi-peril analysis whether you select the Ignore option or the Use System Default option. This is because, if the loss analysis includes a model for which a location's construction/occupancy pair is valid, Touchstone does not remap the codes. (If you run a single peril, the Use System Default option remaps the construction/occupancy code for the peril if the code is not valid for that peril, and will, therefore, produce loss results.)
Considerations for selecting the use system default option
Before selecting the Use System Default option, which tells Touchstone to remap invalid construction and occupancy class code combinations to unknown/unknown or unknown/general commercial during a loss analysis, ask the following questions:
-
Is it appropriate to use unknown construction and occupancy class codes to generate losses for the selected peril? Certain constructions or occupancies may not be vulnerable to a particular peril. For example, underground pipelines are not vulnerable to wind perils in Verisk models; therefore, it may not be appropriate to map an underground pipeline to an unknown construction and occupancy class code combination in order to produce losses.
-
Is it appropriate to use unknown construction and occupancy class codes to generate losses for a particular construction or occupancy? It may not be appropriate to treat certain types of construction or occupancies as unknown. For example, industrial facilities react distinctly to wind or quake perils; therefore, it may not be appropriate to map an industrial facility to an unknown construction and occupancy class code combination in order to produce losses.